Queer Man’s Burden

I met with the sight of this letter whilst browsing through last Wednesday’s Metro:

Uganda Queer 001

My, my! Where do I fucking start?

Curtis’ letter unwittingly illustrates the type of mentality that places The Cause TM far above and beyond the people it’s claimed to serve.

So, how exactly does dedication to the Big Picture induce such tragicomic myopia?

Let me count the ways…

Firstly, in regard to her assertion that granting Ugandan queerfolk asylum just aids their oppression back home, it ain’t as if things improve for them when they stay put, is it? Last time I checked, this was a country which, like many south of the Sahara, happily waded in the sludge of Christian conservatism. Separation of church and state? Good luck finding that in a country where homosexuality’s a criminal offence; one that could become punishable by life imprisonment, or even death, if the likes of David Bahati  and MartinEat Da Poo-PooSsempa get their way. Let’s not leave out the anti-queer campaigns run by the Rolling Stone, complete with naming and shaming and cries to “hang them”; at least one person seems to have answered the call, what with the murder of the queer activist David Kato. The paper’s editor, Giles Muhame, certainly made himself clear, in tragicomic fashion…

‘There has been a lot of crime, it may not be because he is gay. We want the government to hang people who promote homosexuality, not for the public to attack them. We said they should be hanged, not stoned or attacked.’

Oh, well, that’s alright then!

image

Alas, with legal penalties being proposed in the Bahati bill for queer-sympathizers, homosexual or otherwise, he may just get his wish; I can only guess the kind of shitstorm folk like Gideon Byamugisha might have to weather in future.

Taking all the above into account, I ask: what kind of magic leeway does Curtis see opening up upon refusal of refugees? Does it resemble the leeway that opened up for the Jews of the St. Louis pre-World War II?

As for her assertion that “people cannot change attitudes by running away from them”, whoever said that “changing attitudes” was the fucking intention? I thought the idea behind these refugees “running away” was to find somewhere where they could actually, y’know, live out their lives without having to worry about getting bludgeoned, “correctively” raped, and/or jailed for who they choose to fuck.  I wonder, if Miss Curtis met with a potential rapist or murderer, would she stick around to try and “correct” his attitude; or make like Brenda Namigadde and get the fuck out of Dodge?

image

Now onto the most ridiculous part of Curtis’ letter: the rather colonial conviction that queerfolk of “the enlightened world” should become ideological missionaries “taking holidays en masse in these repressive countries for a few years”. Such a gesture, if it came to pass, would resemble Peter Tatchell’s  2007 Moscow adventure: extremely ballsy, yet ultimately futile. Like refusing asylum to queer Ugandans, wouldn’t such a move merely be feeding meat into a grinder? Yet Curtis, in consummate Cappuccino crusader fashion, declares homofolk should go mincing into the mincer for the sake of generating a “global outcry”—fabulous!

That suggestion exemplifies just why I despise identity politics. Does my being a melanite mean I must be fodder for every—or indeed any—cause or cretin with the word “black” as a qualifier? If so, that holds interesting implications for other groups like, say, women; what duties does possession of tits ‘n’ twat impose on Miss Curtis’?

A letter in the following day’s Metro poses the question beautifully….

Saudi Bikini 002

Inquiring minds await an answer, as do her shackled Saudi sisters; after all, “people cannot change attitudes by running away from them”, right?

~MRDA~

About MRDA

The beast shouting "I" at the heart of the world. Alien misanthropologist in a homo sapiens skinsuit. Pass the wine and get out of my sunshine!
This entry was posted in Amoralism, Civil Liberties, Egoism, Ethics, Gender Issues, Moral Panic, News, Politics, Racial Issues, Religion and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

21 Responses to Queer Man’s Burden

  1. Pingback: Queer Man's Burden « MRDA's Inferno | Conservative Government

  2. N. says:

    *slaps herself for not listening to herself when she said she won’t get dragged into this Soros dungen again*

    I had to pray to Josemaria Escriva while reading this, along with whipping myself with belt with rusty nails due to immense white guilt I felt.

    Just kidding. I was doing all that due to rage.

    Oy vey. Ugandian gays are suffering and it’s all whitey’s fault!
    Does it ever, EVER fucking end?!

    Of course, Africans running from Africa due to not having food, water, medicine or being allowed to butt fuck is not only whitey’s fault, but would change if only evil racist whitey would allow them ALL to find refugee in Europe. And no, Europe would not become Africa II. then, because Africans suffer only in Africa and if then ran to Europe, ALL their problems would come to an end. Sans dealing on a daily basis with evil devil white racists.

    I’m sorry, why exactly should Ugandian gays be MY problem? Oh yeah, of course.
    Gee, why do I have a feeling that now all of the sudden ALL Ugandans would become gays and thus have a ”legit” reason to migrate to Europe? Sounds like someone has been working on a plan, a new episode of white guilt. Food, water, medicine, genital mutilation, rapes, murders.
    And now butt fucking.
    Oh, and the mosquitoes, too.

    How dare this Curtis woman suggest that Ugandans deal with their Ugandan problems IN Uganda as oppose to running, again, to Europe! Who the hell does she think she is?!
    A junkie immigrating from France to Germany would all of the sudden get clean.
    This world is insane!

    Btw, where did European gays run to before Europe accepted gays? Or where did Ukranians run to when they were starving, by the amount of fucking 10 million courtesy of our dear oppressed eternal victims, Jews? Where were Ugandians, offering help to their starving brothers in Ukraine?
    Where were Ugandians when Ukraines and other former Soviet republic nations were dying of cancer saving the whole Europe after Chernobyl?

    Who cares, right? There are more important and serious problems in the world, such as Ugandians not being able to butt fuck in their Uganda, so Europeans must, YET again, shut the fuck up, and open our doors and wallets to them. Otherwise, we’d be racist. As if we’re not already per se!

    *whips herself with a rusty nails belt*

    Firstly, in regard to her assertion that granting Ugandan queerfolk asylum just aids their oppression back home, it ain’t as if things improve for them when they stay put, is it?

    *shrugs* I guess. What does that have to do with Europe and why should this be European problem? That’s the way Ugandans do in their country.
    Trying to insinuate that Ugandans are homophobes, would only land me on a list of racists.
    But then again, so would me saying I don’t care what Ugandans do with their gays.
    Ain’t easy being a whitey in this white supremacist world.

    Good luck finding that in a country where homosexuality’s a criminal offence; one that could become punishable by life imprisonment, or even death, if the likes of David Bahati and Martin Ssempa get their way.

    If you ask me, Ugandan gays don’t have it all that bad. Try being a damn whitey in Europe questioning a certain ”historical” event! Yep, in good ol’ Europe you land in jail for merely speaking up a few words, or wrong numbers.

    Let’s not leave out the anti-queer campaigns run by the Rolling Stone, complete with naming and shaming and cries to “hang them”; at least one person seems to have answered the call, what with the murder of the queer activist David Kato.

    Ugandans have their version of Rolling Stone, too?
    What can I say? SOME anti campaigns are more important than others. Equality and stuff…

    Taking all the above into account, I ask: what kind of magic leeway does Curtis see opening up upon refusal of refugees?

    *whips herself even more furiously as before*

    The audacity! Yours as far as literal and hers as far as me being cynical.
    Maybe a magic leewey of 1 billion of all of the sudden gays from Africa upon Europe?!
    And here we are again, you claiming how a European person has no right to close the fucking doors of Europe! Who the hell are these Ugandans that we should offer them refugee here?! Butt fuck at home! So do we. Errr… I mean…

    Does it resemble the leeway that opened up for the Jews of the St. Louis pre-World War II?

    Jesus fucking Christ!!!
    *screams into pillow*

    Always, fucking ALWAYS there’s an imperative of oy vey fucking poor Jews somewhere in the middle of fucking everything! Since when the fuck did Americans have obligation to accept the biggest parasites, even more of them, who have been destroying USA for ages?! Who the fuck are these damn Jews that every damn door has to be opened for them lest we be called racists and anti semites and nazis and the what what not?! Since when is St. Louis a fucking Khazaria?!
    And yeah, so fucking WHAT if St. Louis opted for a moment of sanity and yelled RAUS to these 800 (or fucking 8 million, if it makes you feel better) parasites, who then proceeded with their parazitism to Canada and setting up yet fucking another oy vey monument of never again?!
    Always, fucking always it leads to: if Europeans don’t do this….. then…. remember what happened to 6 billion fucking oppressed gassed holocausted Jews.

    Seriously, MRDA, who are you?! Dumb white liberal or a Khazar, posing a a black dude on internet? Or are you a black dude on a Soros’ paylist?

    And while we’re at it:

    http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/jdecwar.html

    Oy fucking vay THIS. And let St. Louis do as St. Louis wants to do! St. Louis does not owe SHIT to any damn Khazars! They’ve been kicked out of 109 places in Europe – for a REASON!

    Do you ever come up for some air or do you suck on that circumcised dick non stop?

    Seriously, who are you?

    • MRDA says:

      Wow! I hope you realize you’re raging against the phantoms in your head at this point.

      I use one analogy and suddenly I “suck on that circumcised dick non stop”? Did you have sand in your vagina when you wrote this? If so, I’d thank you to wash it out before commenting, next time.

      Seriously, who are you?

      Judging by your Damascusian volte-face, I really should ask you that question.

      • N.l says:

        Right. Don’t go with the propaganda, dare to be enraged in the face of it, and you MUST be insane.
        You’re fond of a “sucking dick” analogy, so I thought I’d use it as a metaphor for po’ oppressed Jews.
        In order for my vagina (it’s always about vagina, isn’t it?) to have sand in it, I’d have to fuck desert fucks. Which I don’t.
        And again, if not insane, then I have to have sand in my vagina for not being a good goyim.

        As far as you asking me THAT question, no need to. I answered it MANY times. Volte-face maybe considering the state of the world we live in, but considering natural order, I just went back to what I was born and what I should have been, again, due to natural order, all my life.
        But, again, considering the state of the world we live in, it’s shocking how it’s shocking that a European would actually wake up and start speaking FOR Europeans.

        • The Crunch says:

          Dear Sir/Madam.

          You are a fruitloop.

          I don’t even know where to start. Firstly if you’re talking about Europeans I think it might be wise to note the percentage of the World’s resources that is controlled by Europeans/Anglo Saxons, all accumulated through Imperialism/(neo-)colonialism whether by Victoria, the British navy and the East India company or Reagan, the World Bank and Bechtel, so really does Europe need people speaking out for it?

          As for refusing asylum to homosexuals, well you’re pretty much condemning them to death, of course it’s such a shame that you are so inconvenienced by this, my heart really bleeds for you.

          As for the Jew thing, well it’s pretty fucking funny when one moment you’re screaming about speaking up for Europeans and the other raving about Jews being allowed into Canada or w/e when most Jews are actually genetically indistinguishable from Europeans.

          As for the sand in the vagina bit I suggest your lern2internet.

          kthnxbai.

          • N. says:

            I peek into this multi-culti ADL sponsored hell-hole every blue moon, so I didn’t notice this typical oy vey from a brainwashed slave of Khazars.

            On a day when Mossad and their Muslim fuck buddies attacked Norway, I say it’s a pretty good day to respond to this oy vey politically correct, sponsored by ADL bullshit.

            I’m a fruitloop. Boy, you really told me, didn’t ya? You know what would have really, I mean REALLY driven it home? Something else from an Abe Foxman manual. Something like: racist, Nazi, white supremacist.
            Of course you don’t even know where to start! It’s not like you have any legit argument against what I said. Let’s, for the sake of the argument, presume, that noting of % of world’s resources is indeed controlled by Europeans. Let’s. Now, how exactly would THAT logically flow into consequence of an argument, that THIS is the reason why Europe does NOT need people speaking out for it? As always, liberals throw any learned propaganda of WHY Europe does not need any defense and hope it would stick.
            As I said, let’s presume. Now, let’s try something that liberals either hate or are completely unaware of: FACTS. Those who control the money control the world via paying off politicians, starting wars and financing both sides (of course, at super high interest rates on money printed out of thin air, which turns every country into a slave who own money to them for ever)), own and control media as propaganda machine (so that braindead traitors like you can spit out the above seen propaganda and pat themselves on the back what a good moral whiteys they are – IF you are white at all) and, among many other things, create recessions and depressions which put population into an even more obedient line.
            So, who exactly owns and thus controls World Bank, EU bank, Federal Reserve (it’s neither federal nor has any reserves, but that shouldn’t matter to idiots like you, who care not for the facts), IMF (I’m sure you heard about its Jew, walking around raping po’ black women)? It’s not Kurt from Germany, it’s not Yaroslav from Russia, it’s not Alberto from Spain, it’s not Lazslo from Hungary, it’s not Jean from France. It’s Ambraham Goldstein, a Khazar (asiatic, mongolish, turkic inbred), who converted to Judaism in 7th century, and spread its inbred NONEUROPEAN sick seed into every European country. So, please, do, for fuck’s sake, THINK before you open your dirty imbecilic mouth and THINK to whom you’re responding. Not every person is blind to the facts and the state of the world. While you MAY very well think you’re either oh so typically liberally knowlegeable and you think how you’re gonna tell me off, or you’re just one of those Jews who is a member of Jewish armada, spreading propaganda around internet, do know that either way, your propaganda will be exposed with facts.

            Next. By refusing asylum (what a noble liberal word, isn’t it?) to NON European gays, *I* am the one who is condemning them to death. Wow. Gotta re-read this textbook “instill white guilt”. No matter how many times I hear this khazarian anti-white propaganda, somehow, I still have to pause about it.
            So, your brain deducted the following: It’s NOT Africans, who are so not liberal, or progressive (insert any adjective YOU use for so called conservatives who are against gays – I DARE you to do it, otherwise I’ll call you what should be your middle name – a hypocrite) and are savage to the point of killing gays. No. It would be ME who is – no, seriously – condemning them to death by refusing them into Europe. Wow! I am the one who is threatening gays to murder them. Unbelievable, the way you’ve been tricking Whites into white guilt. Unbelievable. It’s always something. People like you gross me out. Of course and logically, you had no counter argument against my reasons why these gays from Africa have NO place in Europe, nor does Europe owe anything to them. The only thing you could say is that I am the one condemning them to death. Surely, it would make you racist had you said it’s the Africans, who are condemning them to death, right? We can’t have that, can we?
            It’s not a shame that Africans, so progressive and liberal, right, like you (anyone who’s not a bleeding heart liberal is a racistnaziwhitesupremacistwhogassed6millionjews), are the ones killing gays, right? No no, it’s a shame that a European doesn’t want them in Europe. And after all, if Europe drained all the resources (by the way, how exactly do you survive without products, made by these said resources, such as, oh I don’t know, COMPUTER? Surely, if you don’t wanna end up looking like a hypocrite, using resources you claim only bad evil whitey is using, you must be living in a remote place with no products that a modern civilized whitey created) and is a bona fide racist (you know, whites are racist and only whites can be racist, but there are no races and we’re all equal), why on Earth would they wanna escape to Europe? Oh, you say, because Africans are uncivilized, backwards, who are still burning people alive, genitally mutilating and raping kids (you know, to cure themselves of AIDS) and killing gays? Gee, I wonder who’s to blame for this? RQ. And before you even think about going on another typical liberal preaching march, and start about environment, let me explain something to you: environment doesn’t just happen. It takes a certain group of people to create an environment where, for example, women are not mutilated and gays are not killed. You sure you’d wanna tackle this topic? Cos I’ve got lotsa ammunition for this topic as well.

            And now onto the last JEWel coming from your oh so moral and learned brain. Let’s see how fucking funny it will be when I’m done with you.
            If we, for a moment, skip the fact that Jews themselves say they are a RACE and what exactly they think of other races (really, you should see what they have to say about blacks – I’d love to hear what you’d have to say about those racist pricks – oops, you really cannot say anything against your precious Jews, if you don’t wanna be called anti – semitic and – wait for it – racist! – that is IF you’re white), let’s tackle a subject you, yourself, considering you mentioned a word GENETICALLY (even tho you’re not very familiar with what this word means, unless it’s to be used for pointing fingers at whites what racists we are when WE mention it), opened.
            One of the races on this planet are Europeans. Whites. Only white people can be and are Europeans and only Europeans can be and are white. It’s genetics, see?
            Then you have an inbred race of an asiatic, mongolic, turkish scum, who migrated to a place then called Khazaria. In 7th century, they adopted Judaism (Judaism as a religion, and when I’m talking about Jews today, I am not talking about religion but RACE, even tho I am addressing them as Jews less and less and addressing them properly, without semitic connotation – Khazars). I know this is hard for you to comprehend, so let me repeat what I said earlier. There’s one race, and it’s a European race. Got it? People FROM EUROPE? Asia is not Europe, is it now? Turkey is not in Europe, therefore not European. Mongols are NOT European. You think you could deduct from this very simple fact that Jews are NOT European? And even if we’d thrown in Jews of Israel, do you know where Israel is? Is it in Europe? Hell no it’s not. Therefore, its people cannot be and are not European aka white.
            Genetic tests on Jews/Khazars show what anyone with two, or at least one good eye is able to see: They are not white. I know it’s politically incorrect to talk about GENES as this quickly leads to facts and liberal khazarian agenda is threatened (you know, we’re all the same we’re all equal and the rest of the egalitarian lies).
            Fucking funny indeed.

            But, I’ll flip another one on you. And what I’m about to say, is gonna make MRDA scream how this reeks of Final Solution (seriously, MRDA, you must send Abe Foxman an email, asking him to update that manual; constantly screaming about Final Solution, Turner Diaries and Nazi/racist is getting kinda… actually, it’s wearing off).
            So, you claim that bad evil Europeans drained resources of po’ Africa (thus must welcome gays, and what not into Europe, lest we can live with a white guilt ridden horror of us being the ones who condemn po’ Africas to death for being gays), and following your “logic”, Jews are genetically indistinguishable from Europeans (cos surely, a Jew is just another name for genetically European person), as in are Europeans, do you then suggest we Final Solution (verb) – this one is just for you, MRDA – the Jews? Because they are the ones who own (at least based on their economic system they imposed on the whole world, but even that is slowly but surely coming to an end, regardless how much you and your ilk work on spreading the propaganda) basically the whole world. Ever seen the % of the debt for each country on this planet? Ever wondered to whom we own money? Ever wondered who owns the banks that print money? Ever wondered who forced countries into debt, if you even wondered that anyone is, in fact, forcing countries into debt? Let me guess? Bad evil racist whitey. I sure as hell wouldn’t wanna escape into the midst of such evil bad people as these whiteys are, would you? Surely tucking it in and pretending to be straight in Africa sounds far better than being among evil racist whites.

            As for the sand and vagina comment – rather sand in vagina than mutilated vagina.
            Uh uh, did I just open another can of worms here? What’s next? Opening the gates (honey, they are already opened, thanks to Barbara Spectre ilk – yes, DO google this broad) to mutilated vaginas from Africa?

            I may be a fruitloop, and that coming from a liberal brainwashed Khazar slave, can only be a compliment. At least I am not retarded, advocating the genocide of the race which created the modern civilization. You know, so you can call me a fruitloop on internet.

            PS: I’m sure that by now, you already have at least one room in your house reserved for these po’ gays who are about to storm onto Europe?

  3. N. says:

    As for her assertion that “people cannot change attitudes by running away from them”, whoever said that “changing attitudes” was the fucking intention?

    Are you claiming that people CAN change attitudes BY running away from them? Preferably to EUROPE?
    And why not then give refugee status to these misguided (you know, cos European way is the only right way, otherwise they wouldn’t be running in droves to Europe, but if a European says so he/she is racist) homophobes who wanna hang po’ Ugandan gays? Surely, if they change the environment, which they had no hand in building (nope, that, too is whitey’s fault, while European environment just sprung up and we’re living it up here due to white privilege) and come to Europe…

    I thought the idea behind these refugees “running away” was to find somewhere where they could actually, y’know, live out their lives without having to worry about getting bludgeoned, “correctively” raped, and/or jailed for who they choose to fuck.

    Just like Muslims are running away from the environment they built, to a non Muslim heretic racist Europe. For better lives. And we, Europeans, MUST open our houses to them.
    So, I ask, what the hell does Europe have to do with this, or why should Europe have to do with Ugandan gays wanting to live a better life? If they cannot, and they obviously CANNOT make a better life in Uganda, why the fuck should Europe care?! Are we some kinda charity, putting everyone else before us and our future?!
    Oh, they don’t have food, they just want to live where the food falls from sky. Let them come to Europe. Oh they don’t have water. Oh, they have to walk behind their husbands. Oh… oh oh! When does it stop? When the last European dies off in his Europe?! When all these po’ oppressed non-Europeans wake up in Africa II. that they created since they brought their attitudes with them?!

    Where does it stop?!

    I wonder, if Miss Curtis met with a potential rapist or murderer, would she stick around to try and “correct” his attitude; or make like Brenda Namigadde and get the fuck out of Dodge?

    Oh, I have a feeling Miss Curtis KNOWS what’s ascending toward Europe and therefore does not want more of the po’ oppressed potential rapists and murderers in Europe! And she knows whites have been white flighting for 100s of thousands of years, and we’ve got nowhere else to get the fuck out and most certainly we should not be getting the fuck out of our Europe!

    I reserve what you said to those bleeding heart liberal white women, who are pointing fingers at me, and calling me racist for being against more immigration to Europe. I say to them: go to Africa and get fucking raped and cooked to death!
    As far as Miss Curtis, heads off to her. She knows we’re this close of having 32 million po’ gay from Uganda on our doorsteps.

    No, seriously, now those who butt fuck in Uganda are European problems as well.

    Like refusing asylum to queer Ugandans, wouldn’t such a move merely be feeding meat into a grinder?

    I think this is a fabulous idea. Let’s send those bleeding heart gay activists to Uganda, to reason with misguided (see, I wouldn’t dare them call homophobes, cos that would mean I’m a racist, focring my European views onto po’ Ugandans) Ugandans, who wanna hang gays.
    If that would mean feeding meat into a grinder, I say better there than here.

    Yet Curtis, in consummate Cappuccino crusader fashion, declares homofolk should go mincing into the mincer for the sake of generating a “global outcry”—fabulous!

    Oh, honey, don’t you say that! Before you know it, those Ugandan gays would be stylishly sippin’ Cappuccino in the middle of Europe! *two snaps*

    What Curtis is saying is that Uganda gays are of no obligation of Europe and should not give a damn what finger pointing righteous activists say when Europe doesn’t open her doors.
    Dude, you’ve got the balls to be criticizing a European woman for not wanting Ugandan gays in Europe as opposed to Ugandan government. But hey, what Ugandan government does and its consequences, it’s European fault.

    • MRDA says:

      Dude, you’ve got the balls to be criticizing a European woman for not wanting Ugandan gays in Europe as opposed to Ugandan government. But hey, what Ugandan government does and its consequences, it’s European fault.

      If you read it like that, you really haven’t been paying attention. Are you grappling with your past self again?

      • N. says:

        I’ve been paying attention. That’s what I’ve been doing, for a change, in the past few years, finally.
        Instead of a queer’s burden for not being welcomed in Europe, the title should be (and yes, please do jump on this one and claim how this is your blog and you get the right to name a blog post whatever you wish) white man’s burden list:
        .
        .
        .
        474656252. Queers from Uganda.

        I am not grappling with my past self, which should be evident by every word I’ve written here.
        Insinuation of insanity, sand in vagina and grappling with old self. Easier than to answer why Europe should open the doors to Ugandan queers as well.

        Not a nice way to treat your only (occasional) guest in your house. Let me make room for all you normal, go with the flow, obedient people here.

        • MRDA says:

          Insinuation of insanity, sand in vagina and grappling with old self. Easier than to answer why Europe should open the doors to Ugandan queers as well.

          Not a nice way to treat your only (occasional) guest in your house. Let me make room for all you normal, go with the flow, obedient people here.

          Well, as you seem to willfully misconstrue this whole post to fit your agenda; see anyone not in complete agreement as some kind of “go-with the-flow” PC automaton; and storm in here with baseless personal attacks, how else do you expect to be treated?

  4. N. says:

    That suggestion exemplifies just why I despise identity politics. Does my being a melanite mean I must be fodder for every—or indeed any—cause or cretin with the word “black” as a qualifier? If so, that holds interesting implications for other groups like, say, women; what duties does possession of tits ‘n’ twat impose on Miss Curtis’?

    Mama Europe speaks:

    “Does me being Europe mean I must be fodder for every – or indeed – any- cause or cretin with the word Europe as qualifier?

    Saudis, Pakis, Indians, Africans… is there any fucking group that does not wanna rape me? Any fucking group that does not wanna rape me because their fucking beans didn’t grow on the exact date they thought it should?”

  5. N. says:

    I wonder how she would feel if she were asked to take part in a bikini-clad coach tour of Saudi Arabia in the name of women’s liberation

    *bangs head against desk, whips herself with a rusty belt for a good measure*

    Oh Joe. You fucking stupid hypocritical ignorant trying to be politically correct dumbass!

    Obviously Miss Curtis KNOW what Saudi Arabia is. And why. Obviously she wouldn’t go there to do that, and obviously, she doesn’t want ANY of SA in Europe.
    The appropriate question in THIS context would be to ask Saudi Arabian women to walk around in bikinis in the name of women’s liberation. A European woman has no obligation to parade in bikini in SA to bring about any god damn women’s liberation. See, those cunts, who run from Saudi (heh, don’t they ALL run to Europe?) to Europe to escape the woman-hating Saudis and their attitudes, run to Europe to parade their fucking sheets wrapped around them, and claim it’s their liberation. See, dumbass Joe, what liberation means to a European woman, does NOT mean to Saudi woman. European women brought women’s liberation IN Europe. Saudi women should bring it in SA and Ugandan gays should bring it in Uganda.
    But I hear ya, Joe. In your white guilt ridden attempt to sound righteous and liberal and politically correct, you hypocritically admitted that Saudis are low life uncivilized women hating bastards who would stone this miss Curtis had she brought her European attitude to SA. See, you’re admitting that European attitudes are more civilized than those of SA and Uganda. Wouldn’t that make you, say, racist, Joe? Oh, now you’re shaking! Po’ white guilt ridden Joe! Didn’t think before speaking did ya?
    See, Miss Curtis doesn’t wanna bounce around SA in bikini. She just doesn’t want any of those, who stone such women anywhere near her. Are you gonna go all SA on her and deny her that right? In her home at that?
    Now, why don’t you, Joe, go to Uganda and go face to face with your fellow males there and try to tell them how it’s not right to hang gays? And if possible, bring as many fellow minded buddies with you. Europe needs some cleaning. *smile*

    Inquiring minds await an answer, as do her shackled Saudi sisters; after all, “people cannot change attitudes by running away from them”, right?

    Damn! I wouldn’t wanna be this Miss Curtis! It’s her fault that Ugandan gays cannot freely butt fuck in Uganda AND that women in SA are shackled (should have thought about this before popping out males that shackle them!)!

    No, MRDA, people cannot change living condition by running away from them! We’ve been doing this for 100s of thousands of years! And Europe is basically all that’s left, and we’ve got nowehere to run to anymore and we shouldn’t either! Miss Curtis just doesn’t want to run away from the problems we’re facing – she wants to stay in Europe and take off the shackles! We cannot ignore the problem anymore, we cannot be silent about it anymore for fear of having MRDA’s fingers pointed at us.
    Yesterday po’ SA women. Today, Ugandan gays. Tomorrow Sudan’s refugees. We’ve got nowhere to run
    to anymore. We’ve gotta start taking care of US! regardless of all the propaganda insults to inflict white guilt!
    Be called racist or be dead.

    Btw, since you’re so fucking fond of Jews. Since they were so terribly denied what is rightfully chosen ones’: entry to St. Louis. Why shouldn’t you suggest Israel takes these po’ Ugandan gays? Surely if anyone, it would be Jews who would understand what it means to be denied entry? Surely they would remember: never forget, never forgive and welcome their Ugandan brothers within the only democracy on Middle East? Or… since Israel claims to be in Europe – here you have it – Europe taking in Ugandans. And poor shackled SA women.
    What say you? Isn’t this fabulous idea? Jews, such activists for blacks and gays and Muslims and gypsies (only in European countries, of course), such liberals as they are, I think Israel would be a perfect destination, especially since they are expanding like a parasite that they are.
    Wouldn’t you agree? And then they’d even get to call Europeans even more racists and what not. You know it would make them happy.

    Europe is full and is about to start vomiting.

  6. N. says:

    Oh, one more thing. Did a quick math, for the sake of fun.
    Say, there are 16% of gays in every country.
    32 million people in Uganda. Which means a good 5 million of them are gays (not sure about bisexuals).
    So, which EU country do you think should take them? See, I wouldn’t separate them (oh, brings back those terrible memories from slavery which have consequences till this day, and there’s only that much white guilt I can digest), since every race of people prefers to live among members of same race (but Whites are not allowed to, as that would be racist).

    Few ideas to juggle around.

    -Latvia: about 2 million (60% ethnic Latvians).
    -Estonia: 1,3 million
    – Lithuania: 3,2 million
    -Slovenia: 2 million
    – Macedonia: 2,1 million (with over 30% of shiptars, I think Macedonians would be a model for embracing diversity with this showdown of shiptars and Ugandans).

    Just to name a few EU countries. I can assure you, all that bitching about unemployment would go out the window immediately. Not enough babies being born in these countries (sans Macedonia and the shiptars – they breed like rats they are)? Problem solved.

    So which Eu country will step to the liberal, open society (Soros sponsored via stolen money from whitey), progressive, non racist savior of po’ oppressed gays from Uganda plate and be a model of suicide by white guilt?
    Spain also has around 30% unemployment rate. Just imagine what 5 million Ugandnas would do for those damn Spaniards with no jobs!
    Greece? Damn, how quickly would they repay those loans to Rothschilds with such massive work force! They might even have to work till they are 90!

    Pick any EU country. No, really, do.
    We’re all waiting. With arms wide open. Joe would agree, I’m sure. Ol’ better to be dead than called racist lookin’ ass.

  7. N. says:

    *cough cough*

    One more. Last one.
    Who’s gonna be the lucky gate keeper of Europe to check which of these Ugandans coming to a theater near you is actually and really gay?
    You know all ”that’s racist” hell would break loose if some misfortunate European denies entry to some Ugandan based on a claim he’s not gay.

    That is all.

  8. N. says:

    OK. Before a holocaust furry unleashes on me. My error with St.Louis. I was some other occurrence where Jews were denied and all hell broke loose. Might have been Canada. It’s hard to keep up with all those eternal victims gimme money stories.

    Never mind.

  9. Pingback: Attack the System » Blog Archive » The Queer Man’s Burden

  10. N. says:

    Well, as you seem to willfully misconstrue this whole post to fit your agenda; see anyone not in complete agreement as some kind of “go-with the-flow” PC automaton; and storm in here with baseless personal attacks, how else do you expect to be treated?

    Hmmm… I didn’t see you willfully offering any reasonable “demanti” to anything I’ve said, and I believe I’ve offered quite a few, to me at least, reasonable and, dare I suggest, within my rights (not on paper, tho) arguments as to why Ugandan gays are not and should not be my burden (in a way, copy-paste from our previous battle re: Muslim women).
    I’ve never lived my life expecting anyone to be in COMPLETE agreement with me, as there’s only one me, period. However, this subject (not Ugandan gays per se, but every other gays and battered women and WHAT not that is knocking on guilt door of Europe, period) is something I know I am right about; late boomer as far as knowing about it, and knowing to be right about it, but nonetheless, now I am here.
    Are you saying you’re not riding a PC wave: Europe should bend over to everything non-European? Because as far as I (now) know, my point of view (to say the least) is what is non-PC.
    Baseless personal attacks? You took “circumcised dick sucker” as a personal attack? Well, you do spend quite a few words defending the said dicks. Baseless? Well, you do spend quite a few words defending the said dicks. Or how else do you think I should understand your words?
    How do I expect to be treated? I don’t take your words personally, and I expect to be treated exactly the way you treat me. And by me I mean my words.
    The subjects that you write about, on the other hand, is what I do take very personally. And it has nothing to do with any sand in my vagina or some demons in my head – as you’d dismiss the fact that you know exactly why I think the way I do, but you also know it’s the easiest way to dismiss someone’s arguments. Especially when it comes to serious and dangerous subjects as you open here.
    To fit my agenda? What exactly do you think is my “agenda”? Am I not very honest, clear and direct about what I want? Or do not want? Your agenda is to turn Europe into non-Europe. You think Europe will remain the same after those, who fled from non-European countries, came to Europe and turn it to fit their agenda? You don’t really like Europe for what it is, do you? Cos if you did, you’d want it to remain European. But that’s besides the point. The point (no agenda) of my words is to express my right for my home to remain my home.
    If that suggests I have sand in my vagina, so be it. It won’t change anything.
    If I previously was of an opinion that you, personally, do not belong into that category, I am now more or less convinced you do. Since you’re heavily on the side which promotes destruction of Europe. Yes, yes, I know, having said that means I am waging some demons in my head. Nah, no demons in my head, just outside my door.

  11. Pingback: Off-Colour Remarks « MRDA's Inferno

  12. Pingback: A Load of Old Kony « MRDA's Inferno

  13. Pingback: Fuck Foreign Aid! Pan-Abolitionism for a Better Tomorrow | MRDA's Inferno

  14. Pingback: Fuck Foreign Aid! Pan-Abolitionism for a Better Tomorrow « Attack the System

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s